Root Idols That Corrupt Leaders

By -

Often when one thinks of idolatry, images of man made objects that people bow before come to mind. But idols of the heart are as offensive and destructive as idols of the hands. Things we set up as gods in our hearts are idols, and they determine and drive how we live. Martin Luther said, “Under every behavioral sin is the sin of idolatry.” Tim Keller, David Powlison, and Dick Keyes have written much more extensively and eloquently on the idols beneath the surface, but here is a snapshot of four root idols that drive our behavior.
  • Power: a longing for influence or recognition
  • Control: a longing to have everything go according to my plan
  • Comfort: a longing for pleasure
  • Approval: a longing to be accepted or desired
The idolatry of leaders impact more than just the leaders, as teams and entire organizations are affected. The idolatry in a pastor’s heart impacts more than the pastor, as the church and community are affected by a waning passion for the Lord.
How do these four idols manifest and work themselves out in the lives of leaders? And how are teams, ministries, and organizations adversely impacted?

The Idol of Power (Result: selfish decision-making)

When a longing for power takes root in a leader’s life, the leader leads to be recognized. The motivation is not to serve and bless others but to be known. In the leader’s heart the first question is “What is best for me?” and not “What is best for the organization?” or “What is best for the team?” The result is poor decision-making as decisions are made to advance the leader’s name, to bring renown and accolades to the leader.

The Idol of Control (Result: micromanaged organization)

When a need to be in control dominates a leader’s heart, the leader will inevitably micromanage because after all, “no one can pull this off like I can.” Plans move slowly, people are under-utilized because they are not trusted. The result is an under-developed ministry or organization as new leaders have a difficult time being developed in an over-controlled environment.

The Idol of Comfort (Result: unresolved issues)

When a longing for comfort rules in a leader’s heart, painful and necessary decisions are delayed. The leader fears change because comfort and routine would be disrupted. Stagnancy and issues that are never dealt with are the result.

The Idol of Approval (Result: tolerance for mediocrity)

When a longing for approval reigns in a leader’s heart, the leader leads to be liked rather than to fulfill the assignment faithfully. Instead of leading for the good of those the ministry or organization is designed to serve, the leader really leads so others will like him or her. The result is a culture that tolerates poor performance or poor attitudes, as the leader fears the confrontation could lower his or her likability.
Because leaders set the pace for others, idols in a leader’s heart harm others too. Leaders are wise to heed the apostle John’s encouragement: “Dear children, keep yourselves from idols.”

Credit to : Eric Geiger
https://ericgeiger.com/2015/04/4-root-idols-that-corrupt-leaders/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of leadership styles

By -
Image
Types of leadership styles The types of leadership style expressed in animal characters. 1. Snail Low on performance, low on people style characteristics ·          Sets standards too low ·          Poor communicator ·          No authority Effects of this style 1.        Negative effect on morale. 2.        Negative effect on standard. 3.        Negative effect on training. This snail type of leadership usually concerned for performance and for the people under him or her team. 2. Tiger High on performance, low on people style characteristics ·          Authoritarian style ·          One-way communicator ·          Limits challenges ·          Strong leader, good in a crisis ·          One man band Effect of this style ·          Quiet, defensive team members ·          Poor communication and few challenges ·          Decrease in performance ·          Morale Usually this tiger's style of leadership
Read more

The Fall of Malacca Empire

By -
Image
The golden age of Malacca ended in 1511. Empire Malacca who called to an end after the Portuguese attack Malacca under the rule of Sultan Mansur Shah. Internal Factors WEAK LEADERSHIP & OPPRESSIVE ADMINISTRATION Weak ruling government is the root cause to the fall of the Malacca Sultanate. They were overdependence on Tun Perak until they can’t find a capable leader to replace him. After the death of the Bendahara Tun Perak, Malacca lacked an efficient leader as the replacement of Tun Perak which is Tun Mutahir as a Bendahara was a weak leader because he more concern on his personal welfare and biased during his administration. Many of the ministers expressed their dissatisfaction with this aspect of the way of his management style. As a result, there were often struggles for power. Besides, Sultan Mahmud who paid only a little attention to the administration consider as a weak leader too. He enables the officers to act as they pleased. Bribing and defamation
Read more

ISPS level of Security

By -
Image
hi guys, today i would like to tell the 3 security level of International Ship Port Facilities Security. so there are 3 level of security which level 1,2,3. the securities is tighten countdown with the number. number 3 is the highest security level and number 1 is the lowest.  google image - ISPS code so what is security number 1? google image - isps level 1 so according to marineinsight , level 1 is a normal security level, so what happen in the normal security level, the ship must execute: In normal level, both ships and port operations are carried out in general way. Minimum security measures are always maintained on board and in port. Ship and port operation are carried out as per ship and port facility security plan. Port facility ensures to keep the ‘no access’ areas under surveillance at all times. Ship and port authority mutually supervise loading and unloading operation of cargo and stores, ensuring access control and other minimum security criter
Read more