By -

                        President Donald Trump A True Leader




Last week, Donald Trump fired former FBI Director James Comey – a sudden, shocking and welcome development. Comey rightly stated that the president can fire him for any reason or no reason. Trump operates differently from most. He likes to be unpredictable.
Liberals indignantly speculated that Trump aimed to stifle the FBI’s investigation into alleged “Russian collusion” with Trump’s campaign.
Obama’s mess
I hear people talking about the “deep state” undermining Trump lately. I know liberal judges and government employees are dictating our lives and blunting Donald Trump’s actions. He’s dealing with constant leaks, lies and opposition.
James Comey was part of the corrupt, partisan government problem. An apparently emotional man who felt “mildly nauseous,” he might have impacted the election in Donald Trump’s favor. He then lent legitimacy to the Democrats’ other go-to conspiracy theory of “Russian hacking” to excuse their loss. Perhaps Comey meant to compensate (“showboat,” in Trump’s view) for displeasing Democrats by investigating Hillary for her alleged national security breaches.
Comey was part of the anti-conservative bias Obama built into our government. Recall Dinesh D’Souza’s punishment after he illegally donated to a campaign that ultimately failed. The Clinton-appointed judge sentenced Dinesh to federal confinement and psychological counseling. According to Dinesh (who smiled the day Comey was fired), Comey allocated $100,000 of taxpayer funds to investigate D’Souza’s inconsequential $20,000 donation – “all to please his mob bosses Holder & Obama.” D’Souza likely got under Obama’s skin with his hit movie “2016: Obama’s America,” a documentary based on his aptly titled book, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage.”
Media
Notice that Donald Trump is not girly like Obama. Obama blamed Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and “racism” (which doesn’t exist) for his failure. Donald Trump calls out “fake news” outlets like CNN, CBS and others. Liberal media personalities react very poorly and angrily to this criticism – much worse than Fox News people did.
We’ve seen disgraceful outbursts and disrespect from CNN’s Don Lemon, Anderson Cooper, CBS’s Stephen Colbert and numerous others. But they’re the ones promoting false narratives of “racism,” “sexism” and other fake news. They play innocent and while they delude, divide and incite the people to empower fellow children of the lie. And they assassinate the character of courageous men who stand up for the truth (as they did Bill O’Reilly, Sheriff Joe Arpaio and continually attempt to do with Donald Trump).
Anger
The media described Donald Trump as “enraged” and “fuming” when he fired James Comey – they called it an “impulsive” act of “anger and impatience,” purportedly to shut down the “Russia” nonsense, citing an anonymous leak.
Liberals like to create an echo chamber to make their lies seem true. But if you look closely at these men and women (like Rep. Maxine Waters), you see they are the insecure, childish ones, while Trump is the man in charge.
I often yell and go off when people do insane things. Angry people may think I’m angry like they are, but I feel nothing about it. So it is, I believe, with Donald Trump. Comey’s recent testimony before Congress was undeniably bizarre, like so many other situations he created. Trump had seen enough. It was a long time coming. I think we can all relate to taking overdue action.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Types of leadership styles

By -
Image
Types of leadership styles The types of leadership style expressed in animal characters. 1. Snail Low on performance, low on people style characteristics ·          Sets standards too low ·          Poor communicator ·          No authority Effects of this style 1.        Negative effect on morale. 2.        Negative effect on standard. 3.        Negative effect on training. This snail type of leadership usually concerned for performance and for the people under him or her team. 2. Tiger High on performance, low on people style characteristics ·          Authoritarian style ·          One-way communicator ·          Limits challenges ·          Strong leader, good in a crisis ·          One man band Effect of this style ·          Quiet, defensive team members ·          Poor communication and few challenges ·          Decrease in performance ·          Morale Usually this tiger's style of leadership
Read more
By -
Image
                                            Genghis Khan   Genghis also spelled  Chinggis,  Chingis,  Jenghiz,  or  Jinghis,  original name  Temüjin,  also spelled  Temuchin  (born  1162 , near  Lake Baikal ,  Mongolia —died  August 18, 1227 ), Mongolian warrior-ruler, one of the most famous conquerors of history, who consolidated tribes into a unified Mongolia and then extended his empire across Asia to the  Adriatic Sea . Genghis Khan was a warrior and ruler of genius who, starting from obscure and insignificant beginnings, brought all the  nomadic  tribes of Mongolia under the rule of himself and his family in a rigidly disciplined military  state . He then turned his attention toward the settled peoples beyond the borders of his nomadic realm and began the series of campaigns of plunder and conquest that eventually carried the  Mongol  armies as far as the Adriatic Sea in one direction and the Pacific coast of  China  in the other, leading to the establishment of the g
Read more

The Fall of Malacca Empire

By -
Image
The golden age of Malacca ended in 1511. Empire Malacca who called to an end after the Portuguese attack Malacca under the rule of Sultan Mansur Shah. Internal Factors WEAK LEADERSHIP & OPPRESSIVE ADMINISTRATION Weak ruling government is the root cause to the fall of the Malacca Sultanate. They were overdependence on Tun Perak until they can’t find a capable leader to replace him. After the death of the Bendahara Tun Perak, Malacca lacked an efficient leader as the replacement of Tun Perak which is Tun Mutahir as a Bendahara was a weak leader because he more concern on his personal welfare and biased during his administration. Many of the ministers expressed their dissatisfaction with this aspect of the way of his management style. As a result, there were often struggles for power. Besides, Sultan Mahmud who paid only a little attention to the administration consider as a weak leader too. He enables the officers to act as they pleased. Bribing and defamation
Read more